The U.S. market for imported wildlife not listed in the CITES multilateral treaty

Wildlife not covered by CITES makes up the vast majority of the U.S. live wildlife trade, both in species and in volume.

By Freyja Watters, Oliver C. Stringham, Chris R. Shepherd, Phillip Cassey in Research

October 7, 2022

Abstract

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) is the primary international mechanism regulating wildlife trade, but it lists only a fraction of traded species. We compared U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service import records for CITES-listed versus non-CITES-listed live wildlife and found that non-listed wildlife imports contain 3.6 times more species and 11 times the trade quantity compared with CITES-listed imports. This disparity highlights a substantial blind spot in international wildlife trade monitoring and underscores the need for expanded, non-CITES-specific trade tracking to identify emerging conservation and biosecurity risks.

Posted on:
October 7, 2022
Length:
1 minute read, 96 words
Categories:
Research
Tags:
wildlife trade cites united states conservation policy
See Also:
Mapping the global dimensions of US wildlife imports
Feather forensics: tracing the origins of parrots in wildlife trade with stable isotopes and citizen science
The magnitude of legal wildlife trade and implications for species survival